Leiby Kletzky and the Three Weeks
For Leiby’s parents, we offer no explanations, no platitudes, no philosophy. We can only try to imagine their pain and, in some small way, let them know that we mourn and weep together with them. Their sorrow is our sorrow. Their grief is our grief.
Diminishing Returns — Pirkei Avos 4:12
Why do we think that adding a second spigot to the water urn will double our reservoir?
Mistaking Identity
Consider the Egalia preschool in Stockholm, Sweden, where staff avoid such culturally loaded words as “him” and “her,” addressing the children as “friends” rather than “boys and girls.” According to the AP, “breaking down gender roles is a core mission in [Sweden's] national curriculum,” and many preschools have hired “gender pedagogues” to devise strategies for eliminating “stereotypes.”

Cat Fight
Follow my email exchange with a reader who takes exception to my latest article about altruism.

Is this dogmatism at its best? You decide?
Is Altruism a Programmed Response?
A study by Swiss researchers earlier this year revealed what, at first glance, appears to be an astounding phenomenon: Altruistic robots.

Obama’s Mideast Farce
As usual, Charles Krauthammer is a lone voice of truth and reason in the wilderness of international and media groupthink:
President George W.Bush gave a written commitment that America supported Israel absorbing major settlement blocs in any peace agreement, opposed any return to the 1967 lines and stood firm against the so-called Palestinian right of return to Israel.
For 21 / 2 years, the Obama administration has refused to recognize and reaffirm these assurances. Then last week in his State Department speech, President Obama definitively trashed them. He declared that the Arab-Israeli conflict should indeed be resolved along “the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.”
Nothing new here, said Obama three days later. “By definition, it means that the parties themselves — Israelis and Palestinians — will negotiate a border that is different” from 1967.
It means nothing of the sort. “Mutually” means both parties have to agree. And if one side doesn’t? Then, by definition, you’re back to the 1967 lines.
It’s Midnight — Have your Neighbors Ascended to Heaven?
There’s something we love about a prophecy unfulfilled. But let’s be honest: even if we mocked those who eagerly awaited rapture this past Saturday, were we not the least bit discomfited by a little voice whispering from some distant corner of our minds, “But what if this time they’re right?”
A Guest of a Son of Haman
From this week’s Mishpacha Magazine:
It was the summer of 1984, and I was still immersed in my secular, prodigal youth, living out of a backpack as I wandered across Europe and occasionally reminding myself that following the tourist guides rarely yields the most valuable experiences.
Boarding a train from Luxembourg City to Cologne, Germany, I found myself sharing a car with a German journalist on the return leg of a business trip. We talked about politics, culture, history, and education, meandering from one topic to the next effortlessly, so that the ride passed quickly and the train pulled into its station impossibly soon after our departure.
“I have to wait for my wife to come pick me up,” said Dieter as we walked together out of the station. “Why don’t you join me for a drink until she arrives?”
I certainly had no other plans, so I followed Dieter to a nearby bierhaus. Before we had finished our second beer, Dieter had extended his invitation to dinner and offered me a bed in his guest room. After months of boarding in youth hostels and cheap pensions for five dollars a night, I had no mind to refuse.
Dieter and his wife lived in a small but beautifully appointed house. Dieter roasted a leg of venison he had been saving for a special occasion and set the table formally with excellent wine that complemented the main course.
After dinner, Dieter led me into his den, where we sipped real Cognac from crystal snifters and smoked Cuban cigars as we schmoozed late into the night. He let me sleep late the next morning, then drove me to the local youth hostel so I could check my backpack.
Among his fellow sages, Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel earned a reputation for the conscientiousness and zeal with which he honored his father. Yet Rabban Shimon himself testified that his observance paled in comparison with that of Eisav who, despite his wickedness, had no equal in the mitzvah of kibud av – honoring his father (Devarim Rabbah 1:15). When I think back to Dieter, an irreligious gentile who offered his home, his table, and his company to a ragged stranger on a train, I wonder if I have ever fulfilled the mitzvah of hachnosas orchim (hospitality) half as well as he did.
But there was one other noteworthy aspect to my encounter with Dieter. Toward the end of our train ride, I plucked up my courage and posed a question that had been long on my mind, even as a secular Jew. “How do Germans today feel about the Nazis and the Holocaust?” I asked.
Dieter showed no sign of offense, and answered as if he had given the subject considerable thought. “There are three different attitudes,” he began.
“Those who were adults when Hitler came to power refuse to accept any responsibility,” he explained. “They insist that you have to understand the context of the times and have felt the hope of National Socialism’s promise to renew Germany’s honor. They argue that no one knew what Hitler was doing… which is true and also not true; no one knew because no one wanted to know.
“Then there are the people who were children at the time,” he continued, “or who were born right after the war, as I was. To us, Nazism is a stain upon our national history, and has left us with the obligation to guarantee that it never happens again.
“Finally,” he said, “there is the younger generation – the teenagers who have embraced Cold War nihilism. They concede that the Holocaust was a tragedy, but they will tell you that the same kind of thing might happen again no matter how hard anyone tries to prevent it.”
Then, after the barest pause, he added with a smile, “But these are not the types of things a young man on holiday should be thinking about.” For all his generosity and candor, Dieter failed to understand that I was not merely a young man on holiday. I was a wandering Jew, whose neshomah prodded me on in search of my own spiritual identity.
After arriving in yeshiva, I revisited the memory of Dieter when I learned of the repentant sons of Haman whose descendants studied Torah in B’nei Brak (Sanhedrin 96a). Indeed, the kindness that he showed me proves that any human being, no matter what his background or identity, can overcome the cultural inertia of apathy and self-absorption by kindling the spark of tzelem Elokim – the image of G-d – that resides within him, and by reaching out to help carry the yoke of his fellow man.
And perhaps, in some small way, he even played a part in helping me find my own way home.
Inside/ Outside
Boarding the plane for my 6:00 AM flight from LaGuardia, bleary-eyed from too little sleep, I forced myself to offer a moderately enthusiastic good morning to the smiling steward as I crossed over the jet way and through the hatch. The steward echoed my greeting, then added, “You look very sharp today.”
Shylock in Jerusalem
I’m pleased to announce the publication of my essay “Shylock in Jerusalem” in UMSL’s recently published Jewish literary anthology.
There are no accidents in Shakespeare.
Hardly a week passed without Professor Levin impressing upon us yet again this paramount lesson, and no one passed Professor Levin’s class without learning it well. So learn it I did, but with no inkling of how its echo would reverberate beyond Shakespeare’s era by thousands of years, and beyond Shakespeare’s England by thousands of miles.
