Archive for category Culture

The Boy in the Striped Pajamas

Rabbi Blech articulates how writers of fiction have an obligation to accurately represent reality lest, as in this case, readers and viewers who may never have any other exposure to the Holocaust come away with the perverse misperception that mankind’s greatest crimes really weren’t so bad.

,

Leave a comment

Freedom to Think

It’s truly remarkable how a society that worships so passionately at the twin altars of political correctness and non-judgmentalism can indulge in such unabashed group-think and censorship of thought and speech.

I just saw Ben Stein’s extraordinary documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, which chronicles the attack by the mainstream scientific community — not against the concept of “intelligent design” but against allowing any debate whatsoever on the subject.  Stein compellingly demonstrates how today’s amoral and intolerant culture of dogmatic Darwinism mirrors the Darwinian euginics movement that contributed to the rise of Nazi Germany.

I couldn’t help but draw a parallel with the mainstream media’s love affair with one presidential candidate and its unapologetic assault against the other.  WSJ columnist Daniel Henninger shines the light of objectivity on the lopsided coverage  (with special attention to SNL producer Lorne Michaels’s unsually candid comments), while Michelle Malkin makes a mockery of the media portrayal of Sarah Palin as a bumbler.

(One snippet:  which VP candidate, in an interview with Katie Couric, praised FDR for his response to the stock market crash?  Answer:  it wasn’t the one in high heels.  Oh, and FDR wasn’t president when the stock marked crashed in 1929.  Bonus points if you know who was; you may also be qualified to run for high office.)

If one side has a 100,000 watt speaker system and the other side has a cardboard megaphone, where is free speech then?  (This is actually the answer to those on the far right who accused John McCain of “trampling on the First Amendment” with his finance reform legislation.)   And if those who try to speak out are ridiculed, censured, or otherwise browbeaten for their minority opinions, how long until even freedom of thought is disallowed.

Case in point:  Joe the Plumber, who had the audacity to hope that he could get a straight answer to a fair question.  Actually, the answer the candidate gave was straight.  But the attack dogs that pounced on him afterwards are bound to discourage other questioners.  On that point, I’ll give Jonah Goldberg the last word.

… except for this:  here we have two striking examples of the culture war about which I’ve already written.

, , ,

Leave a comment

We have met the enemy, and it is …

… the electorate that will choose the next president of the United States based on their knowledge of issues like these.

Read ’em and weep.

Leave a comment

Is Nothing Rotten in Denmark?

The Happiness Quotient – Psychologists’ research would have us believe Danes are the happiest people on earth.  A lesson from Sukkos suggests otherwise.

Leave a comment

The State of Communication

Remember Orwell’s premise that if we can’t speak clearly then we are incapable of thinking clearly. Then consider how modern communication provides the opportunity to exchange information and ideas to unprecedented numbers of people instantaneously. Finally, take a look at this and reflect upon what we’re doing with our almost unlimited potential.

Leave a comment

The Candles and the Stars

The Candles and the Stars

By Rabbi Yonason Goldson

And HaShem said, “Let there be light!”  and there was light (Bereishis 1:3).

Even as the first words of Creation set the stage for everything that will follow, they also set themselves apart from everything that will come.  After every other stage in the genesis process, the Torah reports that HaShem spoke, vayehi chein – “and it was so.”  But after the creation of light, instead of saying vayehi chein, the Torah reports vayehi ohr – “and there was light.”

The Malbim explains that vayehi chein implies permanence:  every act sealed with this expression would endure forever.  The heavens and the earth, the water and the land, the vegetation and the birds, fish, and mammals – all these would last until the end of days.  But not the light.

The kabbalists tell us that the light of Creation was not the light of photons that illuminate our physical world.  The light of the First Day was, rather, the ohr haMakif, the divine light of HaShem’s radiance projected into the spiritual void that preceded the existence of the physical universe.  This was the “light” that enabled Adam to “see” from one end of the universe to the other, to perceive the true essence of the world and everything in it.1 It was the light of absolute knowledge and absolute power.

But HaShem foresaw that, after Adam’s sin, this divine light would threaten the very existence of the world.  Used irresponsibly, such power could wreak incalculable destruction.  HaShem therefore concealed the light, storing it away for the tzaddkim of future generations.2 Before the process of Creation had ended, the light of Creation had been hidden away.

On the fourth day, however, HaShem created the sun, moon, and stars – the luminaries whose physical light would substitute for the spiritual light of the first day.  But how can mere physical light take the place of the light of kedusha?  How can the lights of the sky replace the spiritual illumination of the soul?  And precisely where did HaShem hide the original light of Creation?

HaShem hid His light in the Torah, preserving it there for the sages and scholars who, through diligent study, would one day reveal the brilliance of divine wisdom before all the world once again.3

Until then, the physical luminaries would have to suffice, with optic vision providing a barely adequate replacement for the spiritual insight of Torah wisdom.  Through their familiar and uninterrupted passage above us, these heavenly bodies serve to reassure us that the light of Creation, temporarily removed, can be permanently restored by the luminaries of Torah, the bright lights of scholarship and wisdom who light the Jewish people’s way through the generations.

Thus Moshe says to his people:  “HaShem, your G-d, has multiplied you and behold, you are today as the stars in the heavens” (Devarim 1:10).

Was this so?  Standing at the boundary of Eretz Yisroel on the east side of the Jordan, the Jewish nation was still relatively small, the numbers by no account comparable to “the stars in the heavens.”  Comes Rashi to explain that Moshe meant something else entirely.  The Jews were not as numerous as the luminaries of the heavens; rather, Moshe declared that they were as permanent and as enduring as the sun, the moon, and the stars.

Rashi’s allegory seems to echo the narrative of Creation, in which we understand the sun, moon, and stars as an allegory for the Torah scholars who would bring back the light of kedusha to a world of spiritual darkness.

If so, perhaps the connection goes even further.

In addition to the idea that HaShem hid the light of Creation in the Torah, the B’nei Yisoschar suggests that HaShem hid the primordial light in the candles of Chanukah.  The thirty six flames of the menorah correspond to the thirty six tzaddikim hidden in every generation, for it is through them that the light of kedusha is most prominently revealed.

This interpretation dovetails with the Midrash that finds within the narrative of Creation an allusion to the four kingdoms that would rule over the Jewish people in exile.  In the opening description of Creation, the Torah records that “there was void and nothingness, with darkness upon the surface of the deep” (Bereishis 1:2).  Void alludes to Babylon, nothingness to Persia, and the deep to Rome.

Darkness alludes to Greece, whose secularist wisdom darkened the eyes of the Jewish people.4

It was the light of the menorah, restored by the Hasmoneans, that pierced through the darkness of Greece, just as the Torah of the sages returns the light of kedusha to the world.

As a commentary on the verse in question, however, Rashi’s allegory presents a problem.  Since Moshe compared the Jewish people specifically to the stars, why did Rashi feel it necessary to include the sun and the moon?  Indeed, HaShem Himself made reference only to the stars in His promise to Avrohom.5 Why did Rashi consider the allegory of both HaShem and Moshe insufficient?

In truth, we do find allegories similar to Rashi’s scattered through Chazal.  Adam and Moshe are compared to the sun.6 Yehoshua and Dovid are compared to the moon.7 Although the Jewish nation as a whole is compared to the stars, individuals within it are compared to the sun and the moon.

Consequently, Rashi may have recognized something deeper within Moshe’s metaphor for eternity:  an allusion to the unique influence of successive historical eras upon the fortunes of the Jewish people.  If so, perhaps we can articulate a precise correlation between the celestial luminaries that dispel the darkness of night and the Torah luminaries that dispel the darkness of exile.

The quality shared by Adam and Moshe is their proximity to the Master of the World.  Adam was the prototype for all mankind, the first and only human being created directly by divine decree.  Moshe Rabbeinu was the only human being after the expulsion from Gan Eden to speak “face to face” with the Creator, the only individual entrusted to bring HaShem’s Torah to the world.  These two alone occupied a spiritual level so exalted that they radiated their own intrinsic kedusha, like the sun.8

All other human beings aspire not to radiate, but to reflect.  It was Yehoshua who replaced Moshe, leading the Jewish people not only into a new land but into a new kind of existence, one without open miracles, in which the glory of HaShem was recognized indirectly through the workings of nature and divine providence.  In this new world, the kedusha of HaShem was no longer projected by leaders like the sun but reflected by leaders like the moon.

As with Yehoshua, Dovid HaMelech also is described as a disciple of Moshe.9 Not only does the moon reflect merely a fraction of the sun’s light, it also lacks the sun’s constancy, waxing and waning as it courses through its monthly cycle.  HaShem placed Adam and Moshe at the pinnacle of human existence and charged them with preserving the perfection of Eden and Sinai respectively.  In contrast, HaShem charged Yehoshua and Dovid with negotiating the peaks and valleys of human uncertainty.  Rise and fall, victory and defeat, transgression and redemption – these describe the complex pattern of human life symbolized by the changing faces of the moon.  As the radiance of kedusha dimmed, the universe became darker.  But as the universe became darker, fainter lights could shine bright.

And indeed, the darkness intensified.  Sancheriv drove the ten tribes into exile.  Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the Beis HaMikdash.  Prophecy disappeared from the world.  And the spiritual darkness of Greece spread over the earth, disguising itself as a new aesthetic wisdom and seducing mankind with its self-serving, pleasure-seeking, and empty sophistry.

What had become of the luminaries?  Without teachers like Moshe, without disciples like Yehoshua and Dovid, who would rally the Jewish people against their enemies?  Without either sun or moon to guide them, how would the Jews ever find their way?

They found their way by the stars.

A single star offers little light.  But a thousand, a million, a billion stars burning bright across the canopy of the heavens — here is light enough for all eternity.  With each star shining like a single flame, adding its tiny pinprick of radiance to the light of a billion others, the darkness of night gives way before a soft, intangible glow of illumination.  So too, a single Jewish neshoma, shining bright by resisting the seemingly irresistible descent of spiritual darkness, combines with other Jewish souls to prevent the light of kedusha from being extinguished.  One neshoma added to another and another, like the individual flames of the Chanukah menorah, suddenly explodes into the silent darkness like a symphony of light.

In the depths of exile, we have no single leader to shine like the sun, nor even to reflect the sunlight like the moon.  But the hidden tzaddikim, each revealing the primordial light of Creation concealed by HaShem in the Torah, each according to his own capacity and his own efforts, collectively shine forth with enough brilliance to drive away the darkness of corruption and impurity and superficiality.

We allude to this every day of Chanukah in al haNissim, when we declare that HaShem delivered

the impure into the hands of the pure,

the wicked into the hands of the righteous,

and the wanton into the hands of those who diligently study Your Torah.

Rav Nachman Bulman zt”l suggested that the parallelism in this arrangement appears to be flawed.  On the side of our enemies, the levels of evil are ascending:  the merely impure are less evil than the wicked, and the wicked are less evil than the wanton – those motivated not by simple desire but by a philosophical commitment to do evil.  On the other side, however, the levels of righteous seem to be descending, with the tahor – the servant of HaShem who has attained purity and perfection in his divine service – having more merit than the mere tzaddik, who nevertheless has greater merit than the simple Jew who struggles in his study and observance.  Superficially, we would expect to find the pure paired off against the wanton and those who study Torah paired off against the impure.

But this, explained Rav Bulman, is precisely the point.  Although darkness descends when we have neither sun nor moon to push back the night, in the absence of great luminaries the myriad tiny lights begin to shine, showering their radiance as one until, collectively, they have conquered the darkness.

The Torah testifies that Moshe Rabbeinu was “extremely humble, more than any man upon the earth” (BaMidbar 12:3).  What made Moshe so humble?  The Zohar tells us that he saw the last generation of galus before the coming of Moshiach.10 For Moshe Rabbeinu, who spoke to HaShem “face to face,” who lived amidst open miracles and the revelation of the Sh’chinah, who witnessed the redemption of his people from slavery after 210 years of crushing servitude, belief and trust in HaShem posed little challenge.  For Moshe, even so exalted a quality as yiras Shomayim was easily acquired.11

But to live in the depths of galus, in an era of such spiritual blackness that HaShem’s presence seems not merely a distant memory but a flight of pure fancy, and to retain under such circumstances the slightest sensitivity to kedusha, much less the devotion to Torah and mitzvah observance – before this, even Moshe Rabbeinu found himself in awe.  The knowledge that a generation would succeed in doing so left him profoundly humbled.

At once humble and exalted are, like the stars of the sky, the lights of Chanukah and the neshomos of the Jews prior to the end of days.  Flame upon flame and light upon light, they ignite one by one in a common purpose, joined together by a common foundation, illuminating the darkness of galus with the sparks of HaShem’s mitzvos, and spreading the light of His wisdom by revealing the light of His Torah.

1.  Chagigah 12a; Bereishis Rabbah 12:6

2.  Rashi on Bereishis 1:4 from Chagigah 12a and Bereishis Rabbah 3:6

3.  Tanchuma, Noach 3

4.  Bereishis Rabbah 2:4

5.  Bereishis 15:5

6.  Zohar 1:142b and Baba Basra 75a

7.  Baba Basra 75a and Rosh HaShonah (with Rashi ad loc)

8.  Although Shimshon was also compared to the sun, we might suggest that this was not for what he accomplished but for the messianic potential he possessed to permanently restore HaShem’s light to the world.  See Sotah 10a and Bereishis Rabbah 98:14.

9.  Shocher Tov 14:6

10.  Ki seitzei 3:282b

11.  Berachos 33b

Originally published in the Jewish Observer

1 Comment

The Answer

Intuitively, we believe that it is greater to be virtuous of one’s own initiative than in response to orders.  If so, why does Torah tradition consider it more meritorious to follow commandments than to serve without imposed obligation?  Here’s the most concise answer I’ve seen.

Leave a comment

Tripping over my tzitzis — Parshas Ki Seitzei

There is much symbolism contained in the fringes Torah observant men wear at the waist, and many stories about how those fringes can send a powerful message, sometimes to the wearer and sometimes to the observer. Here’s a little bit of both.

Leave a comment

All the news that fits we print

Nevertheless, as long as we can count on an enlightened public to make an informed choice come election day we can all sleep soundly at night.

Leave a comment

E-murder and the spirit of the law — Parshas Ki Seitzei

Last week, Federal Judge George Wu refused to dismiss charges against Lori Drew, the middle-aged mother accused of creating a fictitious MySpace persona to befriend and then humiliate 13-year-old Megan Meier, who subsequently took her own life.  The indictment stands, and Ms. Drew will stand trial.

What is the Torah view?  On the one hand, the sages compare embarrassing another person to murder.  All the more so, it might seem, if embarrasment actually leads to loss of life.  On the other hand, Jewish law quite clearly imposes punishment only upon the actual perpetrator, and only in the case of direct cause.  Neither criterion seems to apply to Ms. Drew.

How United States law should address such cases will be, ultimately, determined by the justice system.  But the defending attorney’s assertion that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act is “unconstitutionally vague” warrants some discussion.

In Deuteronomy 22:8, the Torah commands, “When you build a new house, you must construct a parapet around the roof, so that you incur no guilt of blood if a fallen one falls from it.”

According to the Jewish understanding of Divine Providence, there are no accidents.  If a person stumbles, falls, and dies as a result, then he was already a “fallen one,” i.e., his death had already been decreed on High.

Nevertheless, the Torah obligates us to do all we can to prevent such “accidents.”  The more concern we show for our fellows, the more merit we have collectively and the less our society suffers from incidents of apparently random violence.  If we are careless, abandoning our fellows to fate without regard for how we are integrally connected to them, we bring upon ourselves the guilt of their blood.  It is almost as if we killed them by our own hands.

We all respond with revulsion to the cruelty of psychological harassment, even where it slips through the cracks in the law.  But careless disregard for the well-being of our neighbors is only a little better, and nowhere near good enough by the ethical standards of the Torah.

1 Comment