Yonason Goldson
I'm a Talmudic scholar and professional speaker, as well as a former hitchhiker and circumnavigator, applying ancient wisdom to the challenges of the modern world. I've published seven books, including, Proverbial Beauty: Secrets for success and happiness from the wisdom of the ages.
Homepage: http://yonasongoldson.com
A message for us all
Posted in Culture, Philosophy on December 2, 2008
Kudos to Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein for posting the complete text of the remarks made by British Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks before the European Parliament. It’s an eloquent expression of Kiddush HaShem, whether we speak it or say it … or both.
Certainty and Doubt
Posted in Ethics of Fathers on November 30, 2008
My latest column on Pirkei Avos, discussing doubt as an essential ingredient in certainty and the acquisition of wisdom.
Futility of Futilities
Posted in Philosophy on November 29, 2008
Amidst the senseless violence and the wave of tragic suffering, many in the Jewish community fixed upon the fate of Rabbi Gavriel Noach Holtzberg and his wife, whose selfless commitment as representatives of the Chabad Chassidic Movement to serve a tiny number of transient Jews in Mumbai ended last week with their brutal murder.
The representative of Chabad here in St. Louis, Rabbi Yosef Landa, offered a unique perspective with the following thoughts:
Many Jewish outreach organizations define success in terms of bringing Jews distant from their roots back to Jewish observance or, at least, to Jewish awareness. Indeed, to toil in any effort without seeing the fruits of one’s labors can become profoundly depressing and, as human beings, we need to feel that our efforts make a difference and that we have had some impact upon the world around us.
The Chabad philosophy is significantly different. Any mitzvah, any Torah precept observed by any Jew at any time is a transformative spiritual event. Every single act of compliance with the Divine Will brings the soul of the one who performs the act closer to his Creator, enhances his connection with his spiritual essence, elevates the spiritual level of the Jewish people as a whole, and brings all mankind closer to the final redemption and the ultimate return to Eden. What becomes of the Jew afterwards in terms of his religious commitment is a separate matter entirely. The spiritual benefit of a single mitzvah is incalculable.
To take Rabbi Landa’s thoughts a step further, the sages tell us that King Solomon wrote the words (introducing the Book of Ecclesiastes) Hevel havalim — futility of futilities — in response to the prophetic vision of the civil war that would divide his kingdom, the exile and assimilation of ten of the twelve tribes of Yisroel, and the destruction of the Temple he had built in Jerusalem.
How did King Solomon respond to his vision of ultimate futility? Tzipporah Heller explains that he recognized that only the physical manifestation of the efforts would not endure. His spiritual accomplishments, however, would go on forever. The Temple he built would be destroyed, but the spiritual foundations he laid would eventually support the Jewish nation’s secure return to its homeland in the messianic era.
This is the inspiration offered us by the lives of Rabbi and Mrs. Holtzberg, who exiled themselves to a place far from the Torah observant community and toiled for their spiritual ideals with no expectation of ever seeing their their efforts come to fruition, sustained by their profound faithfulness to the values they believed in and the good they knew they were doing. Despite the tragedy and senselessness of their deaths, their lives benefited others in unimaginable ways, and their example should motivate all of us to devote ourselves to the cause of spiritual selflessness.
Friday Flashback
Posted in Science and Nature on November 27, 2008
Apparently, the legendary “rogue waves” of sailor lore are more than a just a myth, and can reach heights of 80 feet on the open sea. On October 28, one such wave swept over Boothbay Harbor, Maine. The 12 foot high wall of water would have caused catastophic damage, experts said, had it not struck at low tide.
But water, the source of all life and all blessing, has become increasingly a source of destruction. Hurricanes Katrina, Ike, and Gustav, not so long after the Pacific Rim Tsunami, suggest it’s time for another look at these reflections on our relationship with the world we live in.
Parshas Toldos — The Wellsprings of Redemption
Posted in Weekly Parsha on November 26, 2008
Whenever the Torah elaborates upon seemingly trivial details or events, the attentive student of Jewish philosophy becomes especially attentive.
Consequently, the episode of Yitzchok (Isaac) in the land of the P’lishtim (Philistines), by virtue of the amount of space devoted to it in scripture, cries out for explanation.
The narrative of Bereishis 26 tells us that, responding to a famine in the land of Canaan, Yitzchok followed in the footsteps of his father and traveled to the more fertile land of the P’lishtim to await times of renewed prosperity. HaShem blessed Yitzchok with such extraordinary wealth that the P’lishtim became jealous of him and stopped up the wells that had been dug in the days of Avrohom. Avimelech, the king of the P’lishtim, ordered Yitzchok to depart.
Yitzchok camped in the neighboring land of Gerar, and re-dug the wells his father had dug there, calling them by the same names his father had given them. But the shepherds of Gerar quarreled with him over the wells, claiming the water was theirs. Yitzchok yielded and dug new wells, but the shepherds of Gerar disputed these, too.
Only when Yitzchok distanced himself and again dug new wells did the shepherds of Gerar no longer quarrel with him. But instead of remaining where he was, Yitzchok traveled further into the land of his birth, to Be’er Sheva. There, HaShem appeared to him and declared, Do not be afraid, for I am with you. Yitzchok settled there and dug new wells.
The sages tell us that water, the source of all physical life, is an allegory for Torah, the source of all spiritual life. If so, the wells in our parsha’s narrative may be understood to symbolize Yitzchok’s efforts to provide spiritual life to all mankind by creating a greater connection between the physical world and the “waters” of Torah.
According to this interpretation, Yitzchok first attempted to continue the work of his father by living among the P’lishtim as his father had. But where Avrohom had lived peacefully among the P’lishtim, Yitzchok’s presence among them became the cause of strife, so that they stopped up the wells that had been dug in the days of his father — that is, they rejected the spiritual lessons Avrohom had once taught them because of the resentment they felt toward Yitzchok.
So Yitzchok moved to Gerar, at the outskirts of the P’lishti community, seeking to carry on his father’s work where the lessons of spirituality had been forgotten, by re-digging the wells his father had dug and calling them by the same names. But again, his efforts produced only discord.
So Yitzchok moved away from the Plishtim entirely and dug new wells of his own. This time he encountered no resistance but, or so it seems, he achieved no great success either. And so Yitzchok returned to his own land, perhaps recognizing that, after three attempts and failures to serve HaShem in the style of his father, it was time to strike out in a new direction, to define himself as a servant of the Almighty according to his own talents and abilities rather than continuing to pursue a course identical to his father’s.
We know that Avrohom perfected his service according to his attribute of chesed — selfless loving-kindness. And as much as he may have sought to continue along the path charted by his father, Yitzchok had and entirely different character, defined as gevurah — spiritual self-discipline. Where Avrohom had defined his service in terms of his relationship with other people, Yitzchok defined his service in terms of his relationship with G-d. In pursuit of his own unique spiritual self-perfection, he reached the point where it was time to strike out on his own.
But Yitzchok knew the importance of building upon the accomplishments of previous generations and respecting the traditions of those who have come before. Perhaps he questioned his own decision, wondering if he had chosen wisely in charting his own path.
And so G-d appeared to Yitzchok and declared, Do not be afraid, for I am with you. Although he had departed from Avrohom’s style, by staying loyal to the essential values Avrohom had instilled in him, Yitzchok remained a true servant of HaShem. Thus assured, Yitzchok ceased his wanderings and dug “wells” if his own. Suddenly, seemingly out of nowhere, Avimelech came to Yitzchok and declared, We have seen that G-d is with you.
Astonishingly, after Yitzchok moved away, the P’lishtim recognized what they had not when he had lived in their midst. By following the callings of his soul, by respecting the teachings of his father while defining himself according to his own unique abilites and character, Yitzchok achieved so profound a sanctification of G-d’s name that he could inspire the P’lishtim to attach themselves to his spiritual nature even after he had removed himself from among them.
And indeed, on that very day, Yitzchok’s servants came to him announcing that they had found water. By striking the perfect balance between the tradition and individualism, by finding his own path without foresaking the path of his father, by clinging to the traditions of the previous generation while simultaneously developing his own sense of self, Yitzchok brought forth a fresh wellspring of spiritual energy, sending out ripples to every corner of the world. In this way, Yitzchok brought mankind one step closer to its final redemption, while providing his children with the formula for how to carry on in each and every generation.
If they can do it …
Posted in Culture, Science and Nature on November 26, 2008
Live Science reports new findings that amoebas, the most fundamental form of micro-organisms, respond to environmental crises in a revolutionary way: cooperation and self-sacrifice:
Called Dictyostelium discoideum, this amoeba species generally keeps to itself when living in a healthy environment with [adequate sustanence].
But when food supplies run low, the free-living organisms clump together into a community of individuals. The result is a multi-cellular organism. Each amoeba takes on one of two roles in this organism: They either become spores, which can survive and reproduce, or they die and the dead cells form stalks that lift the spores above the ground to increase the chances the spores will disperse to more favorable environments.
It doesn’t reflect well upon human beings that we can’t take this simple lesson a step further than the most simple single-celled bacteria, or that sometimes we can’t even get as far as they do. With the economy plummetting, we hear to little “ask not what my country can do for me” and way too much “where’s mine?”
Jewish history provides endless examples. The world was destroyed in the Great Flood because a culture of greed and violence had spread over th face of the earth, and the Second Temple was destroyed because of the twin transgressions of senseless hatred and refusing to go beyond the letter of the law.
When research reveals that germs have more cooperative spirit and a greater predisposition toward self-sacrifice than we do, the echoes of history should warn us that even more troubles may be waiting around the corner.
Unless, or course, we take a sharp turn around a different corner.
Racism — who, us?
Posted in Culture on November 25, 2008
Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein offers a thoughtful analysis of racism and the form it often takes among religious Jews. Perhaps it’s a manifestation of Jewish cynicism which, I believe, is a defense mechanism evolved from generations of anti-semitic persecution. More on that another time. For now, these thoughts on respect for all human beings and avoidance of chillul HaShem.
The End of the Age of Reason — Revisited
Posted in Culture, History, Philosophy on November 23, 2008
An ultra-conservative friend of mine posted my article The End of the Age of Reason on his facebook page, eliciting some interesting responses from his ultra-liberal friends. Here are three excerpts:
1) Rav Dessler’s point of view that the Holocaust was divine retribution is so revolting as to be beyond belief. American Jewry was far worse in terms of abandoning religion in prewar times than German Jewry, which often gets far more exagerated (sic) descriptions than real ones. For one, reform judaism (sic) was far more widespread in america (sic) than germany (sic), and it was far more radical in america (sic) than in germany (sic). Since the greatest victims of the shoah were eastern european (sic) Jews, among them greatly pious hassidim and misnagdim, [Rav] Dessler’s view is all the more disgusting: this might have been true for a small fragment of German Jewry, but it certainly wasn’t true for the vast majority of working class and impoverished Jews in not only Germany, but Poland and beyond, and certainly is ridiculous when discussing the Jews of the Soviet Union.
2) Sorry if I get a bit uneasy when anyone (of any faith) suggests to me that the [A]lmighty is playing with us as if a child would play with a doll. When the nut-cases like Falwell claim that hurricane Katrina was retribution for the sins of the homosexuals and abortion providers (as proof, he shows satellite images of the hurricane looking like a fetus…).
Only when we take responsibility for our own actions can we work to fix our worldly problems.
3) We do not have true prophets to tell us what is devine (sic) retribution for our sins and simply disaster that we may have brought upon ourselves by not taking better care of our world that He gave us. I am not suggesting that G-d doesn’t care for a moment. I do believe that G-d does hand down retribution, but who decides what is retribution and what is not? are those who are suffering suffering because they deserve it? this is the danger of theosophy.
To my way of thinking, what is truly “revolting” and “disgusting” is the notion that G-d doesn’t care, that He created a world and, according the insidious Deist philosophy of the nation of Amoleik, takes no hand in man’s fate and really doesn’t care. This was the error of Job, who could not explain the justice behind his own suffering and therefore concluded that G-d either isn’t in control, which is only one step away from concluding that He isn’t interested in our fate, that nothing we do makes the slightest difference at all. How ironic that some people find comfort in such thinking.
It is fundamental to Jewish philosophy that even the most seemingly insignificant events are ultimately directed by Divine Providence. Catastrophes of extraordinary magnitude, whether natural or man-made, provide us the opportunity to shake ourselves out of the illusion that life is either predictable or random.
This is the most profound way in which the Almighty communicates with us. The late tennis star Arthur Ashe reported said, after learning that he had contracted HIV via blood transfusion, that if he asks why this happened to him, then he has to question everything good that happened to him. As I’ve written elsewhere, he should ask both, as should we all.
I’ve also written elsewhere that the Hebrew word for miracle — neis — also means banner. Extraordinary events are meant to get our attention, not so that we can say authoritatively why they happened but to prod us toward more sincere self-reflection, both as individuals and as a society, to identify our own shortcomings and misdeeds. Jerry Falwell discredits himself because he is seen (for the most part accurately) as responding with knee-jerk reactionism (or, perhaps, reactionary-ism) and not with reasoned introspection.
The sages tell us that all Jews are responsible for one another. When a problem is systemic, even those Jews who appear neither responsible nor influenced by the problem will suffer because of it. We are one people, and none of us can divorce himself from any other. Rav Dessler witnessed first hand events too inconsistant with the rational cause and effect of history to be attributed to natural causes. He saw the hand of G-d clearly revealed and searched for reason amidst the insanity. Similarly, the events of our world today are becoming increasingly difficult to explain away as happenstance — if we view them with a discerning eye.
G-d does not play with mankind like a toy doll. He speaks to us through nature and history, teaching us to take responsibility for our own actions so that He can shower us with His blessings rather than chide us with His rod of discipline. Today this is called tough-love. But it’s no cliche. Responsible parents know that it is the only kind of love that works. Irresponsible parents eventually learn the same lesson, the hard way.
And a child will lead them
Posted in Culture, Education and Parenting on November 23, 2008
The sages describe yeridas haDoros, the principle that each generation declines spiritual from the previous one as we move farther from Creation and from the giving of the Torah. But spiritual decline has turned into freefall, along with morals, manners, work ethic, and self respect.
Doonesbury is on the mark for the second time in two weeks. Maybe a record!
Friday Flashback
Posted in Education and Parenting on November 20, 2008
I’m planning to use Friday posts to revisit old articles. This one, Mirroring Parents, was extremely popular, and was translated into several different languages.
Recent Comments