Archive for category Culture

Email of the week

Ever wonder what would happen if we treated Torah as we treat our cell phone?

What if we carried it around in our purses or pockets?

What if we flipped through it several time a day?

What if we turned back to go get it if we forgot it?

What if we used it to receive messages from the text?

What if we treated it as if we couldn’t live without it?

What if we gave it to Kids as gifts?

What if we used it when we traveled?

What if we used it in case of emergency?

This is something to make you go….hmm…just where is my Torah today?

Oh, and ooooooone more thing.

Unlike our cell  phone, we don’t have to worry about Torah being disconnected because its calls never fail.

Makes you stop and think ‘where are my priorities’?

No dropped calls!

No worries about running out of power-recharging it

It constantly Recharges you !!

No misdialed or wrong connection etc !!

Can be totally concealed in you.

Can be used without Hardware.

No activation or  usage fees.

Free Nights and Days 365

Free Text

Unlimited amount of users.

Always connects to the President/CEO/CFO 24/7

(Hat tip:  Devorah Goldson)

,

2 Comments

A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Universe

We are never traveling alone.

Leave a comment

Walking in Circles

New psychological research provides still further confirmation of Torah wisdom.

,

1 Comment

The Natural Order

What the Asian carp crisis can teach us about physical and moral boundaries.

The Natural Order

,

Leave a comment

For the Record

First they came for the Communists,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew.

Then they came for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up.

Pastor Martin Niemoller (1892–1984), imprisoned by from 1937-1945 in Sachenhausen and Dachau concentration camps for speaking out against the Nazi party.

Leave a comment

An Open Letter to NPR

Earlier this month, National Public Radio aired a report on its afternoon program All Things Considered that began with this question:

When is a Jew not Jewish enough?

The story went on to describe the circumstances of one Jonathan Leavitt, a native Californian who recently arrived in Israel as a new immigrant to discover that, according to Jewish law, he cannot be considered a Jew because his mother’s conversion process had not been overseen by a Torah observant rabbinic authority.

Amidst numerous quotations from two victims of “domination” by the “ultra-Orthodox” and one indignant representative of the Reform movement, NPR honored its own version of editorial balance by including two sentences from an Orthodox rabbi who, although a distinguished authority, was clearly less than fluent in the English language.

Predictably, the article concluded by playing the “Holocaust card,” implying that Orthodox Judaism is somehow comparable to the Nazi party and blaming its rabbis for dividing the Jewish world.

For those genuinely interested in understanding the other side of the issue, I offer this letter, only slightly revised from the one I sent NPR:

Dear NPR:

I listened with interest to Lourdes Garcia-Navarro’s report about Jewish identity in Israel.    Regrettably, your reporter did your audience a disservice by not clearly representing both sides of the issue.

For the first 3,100 years of Jewish history, there existed virtually no debate over the fundamental prerequisite for conversion to Judaism:  namely, a demonstration of sincere commitment to upholding the precepts of Torah law.  Consequently, the ultimate decision regarding acceptance of any prospective convert finds its basis in the collective scholarship and wisdom of judges who are themselves fully observant and grounded in the legal traditions of Torah law and practice.

Since the early 1800s, however, the Reform and Conservative movements have, by their own admission, discarded adherence to Torah law as an essential principle of their belief systems.  Consequently, because individuals converted by representatives of these movements have been denied the information necessary to make any real commitment to Torah observance, their conversions cannot be considered authentic.

No one is questioning the sincerity of Jonathan Leavitt or any other intended convert whose Jewish identity is not accepted by the Israeli rabbinate.  But just as an immigrant seeking United States citizenship must meet the requirements of this country before he can be considered a true citizen, so too must any hopeful proselyte meet the established standards of traditional Jewish law to be universally accepted as a member of the Jewish people.  If not for this single standard, the Jewish nation would truly become a house divided against itself.

There is no issue of politics or elitism here.  Neither is there, as your correspondent suggested from the first line of her report, a question of being “Jewish enough.”  Unlike any other people in history, the Jews have survived countless generations of persecution and attempted genocide because we have remained firm in our commitment to our values and laws.  Today traditional Judaism is under assault from a new adversary: the political correctness of contemporary culture, with media outlets like NPR grasping for every opportunity to discredit Torah Jews in the eyes of the world for daring to insist that the traditions of 33 centuries are sacred and inviolable.

Finally, and for the record, there is no such thing as an “ultra-orthodox” Jew.  It is a media-created term, designed to imply irrational extremism, just as the name “orthodox” was imposed by the early Reform movement leaders two hundred years ago to imply anachronism and calcification.  Such disingenuous labeling stifles meaningful discussion and is inconsistent with responsible journalism.

Sincerely,

Rabbi Yonason Goldson

Emily at NPR replied to my email, informing me that my feedback is important to them, and that my thoughts have been noted.

It is comforting to know, as well, that “NPR is always delighted to hear from listeners.”

, ,

Leave a comment

A Passage to Hungary

From the Rosh Hashonah issue of Binah Magazine.

,

Leave a comment

Fed Up!

Recipes for a healthy mind and a healthy soul.

Leave a comment

Bullying and Anti-Semitism

A new book about school yard bullying offers an insight into the phenomenon of anti-Semitism.

,

Leave a comment

Talmudic Reasoning

Email of the week:

After months of negotiation with the authorities, a Talmudist from Odessa was finally granted permission to visit Moscow. He boarded the train and found an empty seat. At the next stop, a young man got on and sat next to him. The scholar looked at the young man and he thought: 
   

This fellow doesn’t look like a peasant, so if he is no peasant he probably comes from this district. If he comes from this district, then he must be Jewish because this is, after all, a Jewish district. 
   
But on the other hand, since he is a Jew, where could he be going? I’m the only Jew in our district who has permission to travel to Moscow .  Ahh,  wait! Just outside Moscow there is a little village called Samvet, and Jews don’t need special permission to go to Samvet. But why would he travel to Samvet? He is surely going to visit one of the Jewish families there. But how many Jewish families are there in Samvet? Aha, only two – the Bernsteins and the Steinbergs. But since the Bernsteins are a terrible family, so such a nice looking fellow like him, he must be visiting the Steinbergs. 
   
But why is he going to the Steinbergs in Samvet? The Steinbergs have only daughters, two of them, so maybe he’s their son-in-law. But if he is, then which daughter did he marry? They say that Sarah Steinberg married a nice lawyer from Budapest , and Esther married a businessman from Zhitomer, so  it must be Sarah’s husband. Which means that his name is Alexander Cohen, if I’m not mistaken. 
   
But if he came from Budapest , with all the anti-Semitism they have there, he must have changed his name. What’s the Hungarian equivalent of Cohen? It is Kovacs. But since they allowed him to change his name, he must have special status to change it. What could it be? Must be a doctorate from the University. Nothing less would do. 
   
At this point, therefore, the scholar of Talmud turns to the young man and says, “Excuse me. Do you mind if I open the window, Dr. Kovacs?” 
   
“Not at all,” answered the startled co-passenger. “But how is it that you know my name?” 
   
“Ahhh,” replied the Talmudist, “It was obvious.”

Leave a comment