Archive for category Politics

When he’s right, he’s right

“And part of what we’re going to need is for the folks on Wall Street who are asking for help to show some restraint, and show some discipline, and show some sense of responsibility.”

Thank you President Obama, for condemning corporate irresponsibility in a way George Bush was never able to manage.  $18 billion in bonuses for the guys largely responsible for our collapsing economy is, by almost anyone’s account, obscene.

Of course, speaking of irresponsibility, this was after Congress rewarded fiscal incompetence with 350 billion dollars — no strings attached and with no oversight. 

But expect things to get worse before they get better.  One thing you can say about history is that we rarely learn from it.  Sooner or later, however, either the people will find their voice and rise up in a populist revolution or the next great depression will usher in the apocalyptic pre-messianic era.

In the meantime, look for Rod Blogojevich to get his own talk show or a multi-million dollar book contract.

Leave a comment

Terror is the New Communism

Hey, I got a social disease!

Remember that line from West Side Story?  It seems that the street gangs of half a century ago may have had more on the ball than college students today.  Especially in light of the deeply disturbing conversation on a plane recounted here by Dennis Prager.

Apparently, from the lofty view of the ivory tower, terrorism is merely a foil for the political right to wield in its pernicious agenda to trample our civil rights — just like Communism was only a threat in mind of Joseph McCarthy.

With apologies to Ann Coulter, McCarthy was one of the great criminals of American history.  With apologies to academe, Communism was much worse.

, ,

Leave a comment

Methinks the Governor doth protest too much…

Which of these does not belong:

Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King, Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, Theodore Roosevelt, Jimmy Stewart, Rod Blagojevich?

If you answered Jimmy Stewart, as the only non-political official or activist, guess again.  And if you’re from Chicago, I apologize for bewildering you with a trick question.  If you haven’t been keeping up with the story that has turned political scandal into raw entertainment, the first five names are figures to whom soon-to-be-former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich has recently compared himself.

Rather than fight the charges against him in the courtroom, Blagojevich is attempting to fight them in the court of public opinion.  Probably not the best strategy for the politician who has already achieved the distinction of casting himself as the slimiest creature in the political swamp.  Refusing to call witnesses or face his accusers is unlikely to endear Blagojevich to an electorate long-sickened by bipartisan graft and greed and moral bankruptcy.  It’s more likely that Blagojevich hopes to manipulate his own exoneration by threatening — openly or tacitly — to bring others down with him.

However, Blagojevich’s farcical comparison of himself to every modern hero short of Mother Theresa is really just the flip side of a trend that’s been going on for a while.

Remember the Bush-haters who compared the former president to Hitler and his administration to the Third Reich?  Remember Jimmy Carter’s outrageous condemnation of Israel as an apartheid state?  This kind of over-the-top rhetoric transcends the merely offensive, the merely ludicrous, and the merely absurd.  It’s effect on democratic culture over time is far more pernicious, for it blurs the lines between difference of opinion and true moral corruption, between poor judgment and criminal incompetance, between flawed planning and authentic evil.

The Blagojevich comic tragedy is the logical next step.  If we live in a society where people truly cannot recognize the difference between an attempt to overthrow Saddam Hussein and the German invasion of Poland, why should we not expect a similar confusion between Nelson Mandela and Rod Blagojevich?  If we hear from the international community cries for prosecution against Israeli soldiers as war criminals (from the same people who have remained resolutely silent while Palestinian bombs rained down unprovoked on Israeli civilians), why should the indicted governor not compare himself to Gandhi from the tallest soapbox he can find?

As long as our society descends ever deeper into the sinkhole of moral equivalence, the Blagojeviches of the world will multiply — literally and figuratively — like the proverbial can of worms.

But then again, perhaps I’m being too hard on the governor.  After all, the occasion of his impeachment has been to him, by his own reckoning, like Pearl Harbor Day.

, ,

Leave a comment

Edmund Burke on Civil Liberty

Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains on their own appetites; in proportion as their love of justice is above their rapacity; in proportion as the soundness and sobriety of understanding is above their vanity and presumptions;  in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the counsels of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of  knaves.  Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere, and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without.  It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free.  Their passions forge their fetters.

Hat tip:  Larry Rogul

Leave a comment

America’s Royal Wedding

I was in Great Britain in the summer of 1981 when Prince Charles married Princess Diana.  It was a national holiday, broadcast live on every channel.  The quirky, aging bachelor prince had finally chosen his future queen, and the whole country was intoxicated with the young, fresh, beautiful, charming Diana.

It was nearly three decades ago which, together with the relative refinement of the British, meant that the festivities retained a measure of good taste amidst all the pomp and spectacle.  There were no rock bands, fire-jugglers, or dancing bears, and the newscasters had the good manners not to comment when the nervous bride interposed two of Charles’s four given names.

On the streets, however, schlocky memorabilia crowded the entrance of every shop.  Mugs, plates, key-chains, coasters, thimbles, and clothing of every kind sported the images of the royal couple.  Even in stuffy Britain, refinement and restraint gave way without a fight before the opportunity to make a buck — or a schilling.

I hadn’t thought much about the royal wedding for years, but reports of the Obamamebilia trade took me right back.  Mugs and tee-shirts were to be expected.  But who conceived memorial coins, implying but not quite claiming that they are special-issue government currency?  And it doesn’t even begin to stop there.

Writes Sheldon Alberts in NationalPost.com:

Want some Obama gold-embossed inaugural china? A single plate sells for $82 at the official inauguration store on E Street in Washington, just a few blocks from the Canadian embassy. An Obama inauguration medallion can be had for a mere $60.

For the less spendthrift fan of the president-elect, there’s no shortage of purchasing options – Obama colouring books, Obama chocolate bars, Obama bottled water and Obama paper dolls. For collectible newspapers buffs, The Boston Globe is selling a limited edition puzzle featuring its Obama election edition.

“People are spending anywhere between $20 and $300,” says Aissatou Sene, manager of Making History, a D.C. memorabilia store. The shop’s most popular item? Barack Obama hot sauce.

Maybe I’m just getting old, but all this strikes me as pretty undignified and distinctly unpresidential.  Especially when, according to NPR, vendors are hawking Obama underwear.  Is there more than an echo of Bill Clinton here?

I wasn’t even a year old when John F. Kennedy took office, but for all the irrational exuberance over the inauguration of Camelot, I suspect JFK’s coronation showed a little class.  There was hope-a-plenty then, as now, but exultation doesn’t have to be ugly.

In today’s classless culture, perhaps lamenting the loss of refinement is the equivalent of tilting at windmills.  But the memories of JFK’s Camelot and the wedding of Charles and Diana raise a different specter:  the danger of irrational expectations.

Had John F. Kennedy lived, he probably would have gone down in history as one of America’s competent but undistinguished presidents.  His performance facing the Soviets down in the Cuban missile crisis was admirable, but there isn’t much else to say about his presidency, other than the Bay of Pigs debacle.  On the list of presidential distinction, he probably would have gotten tucked in somewhere between Gerald R. Ford and George Herbert Walker Bush.

The tragic death of Princess Diana came too late to restore her to the pantheon of modern mythology.  Too much scandal and too much information irretrievably tainted her image  — and, to a large extent, the British monarchy with it.

Barak Obama truly does offer hope.  Most notably, he has exploded the fiction that a black man cannot succeed in America.  For that alone, his presidency is historic and his victory desirable.  But he is facing one of the most complexly contentious eras in American and world history, and experience is not on his side.  Most Americans hope he will succeed, since his success will be our success.  But if he fails, what then?  Will the media turn on him, as they love to do?  Will the Republicans or the Neocons or America’s White culture be blamed?  Will it be the fault of the religious right when the dream fails to become reality?

Most pointedly, with prospects so dim and expectations so unreasonably high, can Barak Obama succeed?  Or will the measure of his success demand impossibly high achievement, no matter how competently he acquits himself?

Good luck, Mr. Obama.  Today you’re marrying a very fickle bride.

1 Comment

Inaugurating the Future

The Rick Warren flap reveals how precariously we are balanced between the new guard and the old guard, and how change in favor of moral relativsim is really no change at all.

, ,

Leave a comment

Links to Gaza

Jewish World Review offers these columns on the Gaza War.  They’re all worth a look:

Thomas Sowell on the fantasy of Mideast Peace.

Dennis Prager on how the Second World War might have been fought if the United Nations had been around to with its doctrine of moral equivalence, and on the Media, Alan Derschowitz, and cognitive dissonance.

Lawrence M. Reisman on the misinformation being disseminated by, among others, the New York Times.

Charles Krauthammer on Olmert’s second chance, and Jeff Jacoby, with a disturbing look at modern anti-semitism.

Some observations on why the Moslem street gets angry.

,

Leave a comment

Gaza and Terrorism

Here are a couple of excellent articles:

Charles Krauthammer on Olmert’s second chance, and Jeff Jacoby, with a disturbing look at modern anti-semitism.

,

Leave a comment

Protesting Violence Against Whom?

Here’s another news flash:  Muslims Protest Gaza Violence.  I’m trying hard to remember, but I can’t seem to recall any stories headed with Muslims Protest 9/11.

It’s ironic, really, how so many Jews today take up every cause of injustice, from Darfor to Rwanda to YouNameIt, with the most extreme apologists bending over backward to embrace the perverse moral equivalence of the Left by faulting Israel for inciting the Palestinians.  In a strange way, it’s symptomatic of a positive inclination, the willingness to examine oneself and judge others favorably, to damand justice not only when one’s own welfare is threatened but for others whom one may never meet.  It’s a traditionally Jewish response to not stand by indifferently while others suffer.

As much as it may be true that most Muslims and most Arabs are not terrorists themselves, as much as it may be true that Hamas has created a culture of terror where even those who condemn their actions and tactics are afraid to open their mouths in protest, where is the outrage on the “Arab Street” over violence against non-Muslims?  Remember their response to 9/11?  It wasn’t outrage, it was elation.

If the Arab and Muslim worlds truly want peace, they need to show us that they care about victims other than their own.

Leave a comment

More on Gaza: Moral Idiocy and the Conflicted Left

Dennis Prager on the Mideast, the Media, Alan Derschowitz, and cognitive dissonance. I wonder if Dershowitz will respond to Prager’s call for consistency.

, ,

Leave a comment