Posts Tagged Jewish Philosophy

Der Meistersingers of Athens

Moaz Tzur, the classic Chanukah poem, has been degraded not so much by the King Jamesian translation Rock of Ages but by the carol-like tune that has become as inescapable as shoppping mall Xmas music.  It’s worse than you think… which is part of the problem.

, ,

Leave a comment

The Candles and the Stars

From this month’s Jewish Observer:

            And HaShem said, “Let there be light!”  and there was light (Bereishis 1:3).

            Even as the first words of Creation set the stage for everything that will follow, they also set themselves apart from everything that will come.  After every other stage in the genesis process, the Torah reports that HaShem spoke, vayehi chein – “and it was so.”  But after the creation of light, instead of saying vayehi chein, the Torah reports vayehi ohr – “and there was light.”

            The Malbim explains that vayehi chein implies permanence:  every act sealed with this expression would endure forever.  The heavens and the earth, the water and the land, the vegetation and the birds, fish, and mammals – all these would last until the end of days.  But not the light.

            The kabbalists tell us that the light of Creation was not the light of photons that illuminate our physical world.  The light of the First Day was, rather, the ohr haMakif, the divine light of HaShem’s radiance projected into the spiritual void that preceded the existence of the physical universe.  This was the “light” that enabled Adam to “see” from one end of the universe to the other, to perceive the true essence of the world and everything in it.1  It was the light of absolute knowledge and absolute power.

            But HaShem foresaw that, after Adam’s sin, this divine light would threaten the very existence of the world.  Used irresponsibly, such power could wreak incalculable destruction.  HaShem therefore concealed the light, storing it away for the tzaddkim of future generations.2  Before the process of Creation had ended, the light of Creation had been hidden away.

                       

            On the fourth day, however, HaShem created the sun, moon, and stars – the luminaries whose physical light would substitute for the spiritual light of the first day.  But how can mere physical light take the place of the light of kedusha?  How can the lights of the sky replace the spiritual illumination of the soul?  And precisely where did HaShem hide the original light of Creation?

            HaShem hid His light in the Torah, preserving it there for the sages and scholars who, through diligent study, would one day reveal the brilliance of divine wisdom before all the world once again.3

            Until then, the physical luminaries would have to suffice, with optic vision providing a barely adequate replacement for the spiritual insight of Torah wisdom.  Through their familiar and uninterrupted passage above us, these heavenly bodies serve to reassure us that the light of Creation, temporarily removed, can be permanently restored by the luminaries of Torah, the bright lights of scholarship and wisdom who light the Jewish people’s way through the generations.

            Thus Moshe says to his people:  “HaShem, your G-d, has multiplied you and behold, you are today as the stars in the heavens” (Devarim 1:10).

 

            Was this so?  Standing at the boundary of Eretz Yisroel on the east side of the Jordan, the Jewish nation was still relatively small, the numbers by no account comparable to “the stars in the heavens.”  Comes Rashi to explain that Moshe meant something else entirely.  The Jews were not as numerous as the luminaries of the heavens; rather, Moshe declared that they were as permanent and as enduring as the sun, the moon, and the stars.

            Rashi’s allegory seems to echo the narrative of Creation, in which we understand the sun, moon, and stars as an allegory for the Torah scholars who would bring back the light of kedusha to a world of spiritual darkness.

            If so, perhaps the connection goes even further.

            In addition to the idea that HaShem hid the light of Creation in the Torah, the B’nei Yisoschar suggests that HaShem hid the primordial light in the candles of Chanukah.  The thirty six flames of the menorah correspond to the thirty six tzaddikim hidden in every generation, for it is through them that the light of kedusha is most prominently revealed. 

            This interpretation dovetails with the Midrash that finds within the narrative of Creation an allusion to the four kingdoms that would rule over the Jewish people in exile.  In the opening description of Creation, the Torah records that “there was void and nothingness, with darkness upon the surface of the deep” (Bereishis 1:2).  Void alludes to Babylon, nothingness to Persia, and the deep to Rome.

            Darkness alludes to Greece, whose secularist wisdom darkened the eyes of the Jewish people.4

            It was the light of the menorah, restored by the Hasmoneans, that pierced through the darkness of Greece, just as the Torah of the sages returns the light of kedusha to the world.

 

            As a commentary on the verse in question, however, Rashi’s allegory presents a problem.  Since Moshe compared the Jewish people specifically to the stars, why did Rashi feel it necessary to include the sun and the moon?  Indeed, HaShem Himself made reference only to the stars in His promise to Avrohom.5  Why did Rashi consider the allegory of both HaShem and Moshe insufficient?

            In truth, we do find allegories similar to Rashi’s scattered through Chazal.  Adam and Moshe are compared to the sun.6  Yehoshua and Dovid are compared to the moon.7  Although the Jewish nation as a whole is compared to the stars, individuals within it are compared to the sun and the moon.

            Consequently, Rashi may have recognized something deeper within Moshe’s metaphor for eternity:  an allusion to the unique influence of successive historical eras upon the fortunes of the Jewish people.  If so, perhaps we can articulate a precise correlation between the celestial luminaries that dispel the darkness of night and the Torah luminaries that dispel the darkness of exile.

            The quality shared by Adam and Moshe is their proximity to the Master of the World.  Adam was the prototype for all mankind, the first and only human being created directly by divine decree.  Moshe Rabbeinu was the only human being after the expulsion from Gan Eden to speak “face to face” with the Creator, the only individual entrusted to bring HaShem’s Torah to the world.  These two alone occupied a spiritual level so exalted that they radiated their own intrinsic kedusha, like the sun.8

            All other human beings aspire not to radiate, but to reflect.  It was Yehoshua who replaced Moshe, leading the Jewish people not only into a new land but into a new kind of existence, one without open miracles, in which the glory of HaShem was recognized indirectly through the workings of nature and divine providence.  In this new world, the kedusha of HaShem was no longer projected by leaders like the sun but reflected by leaders like the moon.

            As with Yehoshua, Dovid HaMelech also is described as a disciple of Moshe.9   Not only does the moon reflect merely a fraction of the sun’s light, it also lacks the sun’s constancy, waxing and waning as it courses through its monthly cycle.  HaShem placed Adam and Moshe at the pinnacle of human existence and charged them with preserving the perfection of Eden and Sinai respectively.  In contrast, HaShem charged Yehoshua and Dovid with negotiating the peaks and valleys of human uncertainty.  Rise and fall, victory and defeat, transgression and redemption – these describe the complex pattern of human life symbolized by the changing faces of the moon.  As the radiance of kedusha dimmed, the universe became darker.  But as the universe became darker, fainter lights could shine bright.

            And indeed, the darkness intensified.  Sancheriv drove the ten tribes into exile.  Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the Beis HaMikdash.  Prophecy disappeared from the world.  And the spiritual darkness of Greece spread over the earth, disguising itself as a new aesthetic wisdom and seducing mankind with its self-serving, pleasure-seeking, and empty sophistry.

            What had become of the luminaries?  Without teachers like Moshe, without disciples like Yehoshua and Dovid, who would rally the Jewish people against their enemies?  Without either sun or moon to guide them, how would the Jews ever find their way?

            They found their way by the stars.

 

            A single star offers little light.  But a thousand, a million, a billion stars burning bright across the canopy of the heavens — here is light enough for all eternity.  With each star shining like a single flame, adding its tiny pinprick of radiance to the light of a billion others, the darkness of night gives way before a soft, intangible glow of illumination.  So too, a single Jewish neshoma, shining bright by resisting the seemingly irresistible descent of spiritual darkness, combines with other Jewish souls to prevent the light of kedusha from being extinguished.  One neshoma added to another and another, like the individual flames of the Chanukah menorah, suddenly explodes into the silent darkness like a symphony of light.

            In the depths of exile, we have no single leader to shine like the sun, nor even to reflect the sunlight like the moon.  But the hidden tzaddikim, each revealing the primordial light of Creation concealed by HaShem in the Torah, each according to his own capacity and his own efforts, collectively shine forth with enough brilliance to drive away the darkness of corruption and impurity and superficiality.

            We allude to this every day of Chanukah in al haNissim, when we declare that HaShem delivered

 

            the impure into the hands of the pure,

            the wicked into the hands of the righteous,

            and the wanton into the hands of those who diligently study Your Torah.

 

            Rav Nachman Bulman zt”l suggested that the parallelism in this arrangement appears to be flawed.  On the side of our enemies, the levels of evil are ascending:  the merely impure are less evil than the wicked, and the wicked are less evil than the wanton – those motivated not by simple desire but by a philosophical commitment to do evil.  On the other side, however, the levels of righteous seem to be descending, with the tahor – the servant of HaShem who has attained purity and perfection in his divine service – having more merit than the mere tzaddik, who nevertheless has greater merit than the simple Jew who struggles in his study and observance.  Superficially, we would expect to find the pure paired off against the wanton and those who study Torah paired off against the impure.

            But this, explained Rav Bulman, is precisely the point.  Although darkness descends when we have neither sun nor moon to push back the night, in the absence of great luminaries the myriad tiny lights begin to shine, showering their radiance as one until, collectively, they have conquered the darkness.

 

            The Torah testifies that Moshe Rabbeinu was “extremely humble, more than any man upon the earth” (BaMidbar 12:3).  What made Moshe so humble?  The Zohar tells us that he saw the last generation of galus before the coming of Moshiach.10  For Moshe Rabbeinu, who spoke to HaShem “face to face,” who lived amidst open miracles and the revelation of the Sh’chinah, who witnessed the redemption of his people from slavery after 210 years of crushing servitude, belief and trust in HaShem posed little challenge.  For Moshe, even so exalted a quality as yiras Shomayim was easily acquired.11

             But to live in the depths of galus, in an era of such spiritual blackness that HaShem’s presence seems not merely a distant memory but a flight of pure fancy, and to retain under such circumstances the slightest sensitivity to kedusha, much less the devotion to Torah and mitzvah observance – before this, even Moshe Rabbeinu found himself in awe.  The knowledge that a generation would succeed in doing so left him profoundly humbled.

            At once humble and exalted are, like the stars of the sky, the lights of Chanukah and the neshomos of the Jews prior to the end of days.  Flame upon flame and light upon light, they ignite one by one in a common purpose, joined together by a common foundation, illuminating the darkness of galus with the sparks of HaShem’s mitzvos, and spreading the light of His wisdom by revealing the light of His Torah.

 

1.  Chagigah 12a; Bereishis Rabbah 12:6

2.  Rashi on Bereishis 1:4 from Chagigah 12a and Bereishis Rabbah 3:6

3.  Tanchuma, Noach 3

4.  Bereishis Rabbah 2:4

5.  Bereishis 15:5

6.  Zohar 1:142b and Baba Basra 75a

7.  Baba Basra 75a and Rosh HaShonah (with Rashi ad loc)

8.  Although Shimshon was also compared to the sun, we might suggest that this was not for what he accomplished but for the messianic potential he possessed to permanently restore HaShem’s light to the world.  See Sotah 10a and Bereishis Rabbah 98:14.

9.  Shocher Tov 14:6

10.  Ki seitzei 3:282b

11.  Berachos 33b

, ,

Leave a comment

Princes in Exile

More than any other holiday, Chanukah addresses the Jewish experience in exile.

,

Leave a comment

The Candles and the Tree

Reflections on having grown up under the modern shadow of the ancient Greeks.  And, as was pointed out to me a year or two ago, the term I used for the Hellenistic agenda of blending Jewish culture with Greek culture should have be new syncretism.

May this year be a year of light and wisdom for all of us.

, ,

Leave a comment

The Mystical Meaning of the Dreidel

More than merely a child’s toy or a candle-side game, the dreidel conceals the secret of Jewish survival throughout the long darkness of exile.

, , ,

Leave a comment

Parshas Vayeishev — The Final Battlefield

The confrontation between Yaakov and Eisav plays itself out in the headlines of our times.

,

3 Comments

A message for us all

Kudos to Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein for posting the complete text of the remarks made by British Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks before the European Parliament.  It’s an eloquent expression of Kiddush HaShem, whether we speak it or say it … or both.

,

Leave a comment

Futility of Futilities

Amidst the senseless violence and the wave of tragic suffering, many in the Jewish community fixed upon the fate of Rabbi Gavriel Noach Holtzberg and his wife, whose selfless commitment as representatives of the Chabad Chassidic Movement to serve a tiny number of transient Jews in Mumbai ended last week with their brutal murder.

The representative of Chabad here in St. Louis, Rabbi Yosef Landa, offered a unique perspective with the following thoughts:

Many Jewish outreach organizations define success in terms of bringing Jews distant from their roots back to Jewish observance or, at least, to Jewish awareness.  Indeed, to toil in any effort without seeing the fruits of one’s labors can become profoundly depressing and, as human beings, we need to feel that our efforts make a difference and that we have had some impact upon the world around us.

The Chabad philosophy is significantly different.  Any mitzvah, any Torah precept observed by any Jew at any time is a transformative spiritual event.  Every single act of compliance with the Divine Will brings the soul of the one who performs the act closer to his Creator, enhances his connection with his spiritual essence, elevates the spiritual level of the Jewish people as a whole, and brings all mankind closer to the final redemption and the ultimate return to Eden.  What becomes of the Jew afterwards in terms of his religious commitment is a separate matter entirely.  The spiritual benefit of a single mitzvah is incalculable.

To take Rabbi Landa’s thoughts a step further, the sages tell us that King Solomon wrote the words (introducing the Book of Ecclesiastes) Hevel havalim — futility of futilities — in response to the prophetic vision of the civil war that would divide his kingdom, the exile and assimilation of ten of the twelve tribes of Yisroel, and the destruction of the Temple he had built in Jerusalem.

How did King Solomon respond to his vision of ultimate futility?  Tzipporah Heller explains that he recognized that only the physical manifestation of the efforts would not endure.  His spiritual accomplishments, however, would go on forever.  The Temple he built would be destroyed, but the spiritual foundations he laid would eventually support the Jewish nation’s secure return to its homeland in the messianic era.

This is the inspiration offered us by the lives of Rabbi and Mrs. Holtzberg, who exiled themselves to a place far from the Torah observant community and toiled for their spiritual ideals with no expectation of ever seeing their their efforts come to fruition, sustained by their profound faithfulness to the values they believed in and the good they knew they were doing.  Despite the tragedy and senselessness of their deaths, their lives benefited others in unimaginable ways, and their example should motivate all of us to devote ourselves to the cause of spiritual selflessness.

,

1 Comment

Friday Flashback

Apparently, the legendary “rogue waves” of sailor lore are more than a just a myth, and can reach heights of 80 feet on the open sea.  On October 28, one such wave swept over Boothbay Harbor, Maine.  The 12 foot high wall of water would have caused catastophic damage, experts said, had it not struck at low tide.

But water, the source of all life and all blessing, has become increasingly a source of destruction.  Hurricanes Katrina, Ike, and Gustav, not so long after the Pacific Rim Tsunami, suggest it’s time for another look at these reflections on our relationship with the world we live in.

,

Leave a comment

The End of the Age of Reason — Revisited

An ultra-conservative friend of mine posted my article The End of the Age of Reason on his facebook page, eliciting some interesting responses from his ultra-liberal friends.  Here are three excerpts:

1)  Rav Dessler’s point of view that the Holocaust was divine retribution is so revolting as to be beyond belief. American Jewry was far worse in terms of abandoning religion in prewar times than German Jewry, which often gets far more exagerated (sic) descriptions than real ones. For one, reform judaism (sic) was far more widespread in america (sic) than germany (sic), and it was far more radical in america (sic) than in germany (sic). Since the greatest victims of the shoah were eastern european (sic) Jews, among them greatly pious hassidim and misnagdim, [Rav] Dessler’s view is all the more disgusting: this might have been true for a small fragment of German Jewry, but it certainly wasn’t true for the vast majority of working class and impoverished Jews in not only Germany, but Poland and beyond, and certainly is ridiculous when discussing the Jews of the Soviet Union.
    
2)  Sorry if I get a bit uneasy when anyone (of any faith) suggests to me that the [A]lmighty is playing with us as if a child would play with a doll. When the nut-cases like Falwell claim that hurricane Katrina was retribution for the sins of the homosexuals and abortion providers (as proof, he shows satellite images of the hurricane looking like a fetus…).
Only when we take responsibility for our own actions can we work to fix our worldly problems.
    
3)  We do not have true prophets to tell us what is devine (sic) retribution for our sins and simply disaster that we may have brought upon ourselves by not taking better care of our world that He gave us. I am not suggesting that G-d doesn’t care for a moment. I do believe that G-d does hand down retribution, but who decides what is retribution and what is not? are those who are suffering suffering because they deserve it? this is the danger of theosophy.

To my way of thinking, what is truly “revolting” and “disgusting” is the notion that G-d doesn’t care, that He created a world and, according the insidious Deist philosophy of the nation of Amoleik, takes no hand in man’s fate and really doesn’t care.  This was the error of Job, who could not explain the justice behind his own suffering and therefore concluded that G-d either isn’t in control, which is only one step away from concluding that He isn’t interested in our fate, that nothing we do makes the slightest difference at all.  How ironic that some people find comfort in such thinking.

It is fundamental to Jewish philosophy that even the most seemingly insignificant events are ultimately directed by Divine Providence.  Catastrophes of extraordinary magnitude, whether natural or man-made, provide us the opportunity to shake ourselves out of the illusion that life is either predictable or random.

This is the most profound way in which the Almighty communicates with us.  The late tennis star Arthur Ashe reported said, after learning that he had contracted HIV via blood transfusion, that if he asks why this happened to him, then he has to question everything good that happened to him.  As I’ve written elsewhere, he should ask both, as should we all.

I’ve also written elsewhere that the Hebrew word for miracleneis — also means banner.  Extraordinary events are meant to get our attention, not so that we can say authoritatively why they happened but to prod us toward more sincere self-reflection, both as individuals and as a society, to identify our own shortcomings and misdeeds.  Jerry Falwell discredits himself because he is seen (for the most part accurately) as responding with knee-jerk reactionism (or, perhaps, reactionary-ism) and not with reasoned introspection.

The sages tell us that all Jews are responsible for one another.  When a problem is systemic, even those Jews who appear neither responsible nor influenced by the problem will suffer because of it.  We are one people, and none of us can divorce himself from any other.  Rav Dessler witnessed first hand events too inconsistant with the rational cause and effect of history to be attributed to natural causes.  He saw the hand of G-d clearly revealed and searched for reason amidst the insanity.  Similarly, the events of our world today are becoming increasingly difficult to explain away as happenstance — if we view them with a discerning eye.

G-d does not play with mankind like a toy doll.  He speaks to us through nature and history, teaching us to take responsibility for our own actions so that He can shower us with His blessings rather than chide us with His rod of discipline.  Today this is called tough-love.  But it’s no cliche.  Responsible parents know that it is the only kind of love that works.  Irresponsible parents eventually learn the same lesson, the hard way.

,

3 Comments