Yonason Goldson

I'm a Talmudic scholar and professional speaker, as well as a former hitchhiker and circumnavigator, applying ancient wisdom to the challenges of the modern world. I've published seven books, including, Proverbial Beauty: Secrets for success and happiness from the wisdom of the ages.

Homepage: http://yonasongoldson.com

New car, caviar, four star daydream

Money, its a gas.
Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash.
New car, caviar, four star daydream,
Think I’ll buy me a football team.

Yes, I know that most Torah posts don’t begin with lyrics from Pink Floyd.  But what’s the advantage of coming from a secular background if you can’t resurrect some of the nonsense of your past life and use it to give your point a little more punch?

I heard a story only yesterday — one of the many sad stories of people whose feet were swept out from under them by the current financial collapse — about a fellow who had made millions buying up 800 numbers based on the names of big businesses and then selling the numbers to those same corporations.  Then came the age of the website and his business evaporated.  Now he’s deep in debt with huge obligations and no prospects.

Although my heart goes out to this person and his family, it’s difficult not to see in this story yet another symptom of the mentality that created the current economic crisis.

Torah law prohibits any Jew from either charging or paying any other Jew interest.  Why?  Although there is no prohibition against profiting through other business dealings, the charging of interest is in a class by itself, for it is neither investment, nor commerce, nor production.  It is making money from someone else’s money by taking advantage of someone else’s need which, according to Jewish philosophy, is not profiting but profiteering.

The Torah wants us to acquire a sensitivity to the difference between business and opportunism.  (It’s worth noting that once upon a time even the Christian world retained this sensitivity, and that Jews were forced to support themselves through moneylending because Christian society prohibited them from engaging in “respectable” professions.)

As I’ve written in connection with this week’s Torah portion, we have created an economy in which nothing is produced and nothing is created, in which business is  increasingly defined by an insatiable appetite for quick profits through the manipulation of other people’s money.  Such a system, as we discovered so unpleasantly, cannot sustain itself.

The most recent example is Bernard Madoff, who convinced some of the most respected and distinguished investors in the western world that he held the keys to the kingdom of inexhaustable riches, bilking them to the tune of 50 billion dollars.  No one asked questions, no one noticed the telltale signs of inviability because no one wanted to look that hard.

About a dozen years ago, when I was living in Atlanta, a man won a $4 million lottery — an extraordinary amount for the time.  He had been working a double-shift as a garbage collector.  When asked what he intended to do with his new-found fortune, he replied:

“I’m going to quit one of my shifts.”

The astonished reporter then asked:  “Only one of your shifts?”

The new millionaire answered back:  “A man has to work.”

Wise words from a wise man, garbage collection aside.  Today the conventional vision of success is wealth without effort.  Or, paradoxically, pathological exertion devoted toward the goal of leisure and recreation.  More on this in a later post.

For now, it’s worth recalling the deceptively simple words of the misha:  Who is rich?  The one who is happy with his portion.  Those caught up in the relentless pursuit of ever greater wealth are anything but happy and anything but rich, no matter how much money they may have.

, ,

Leave a comment

By Any Other Name

There’s no joy in Mao-ville.  Thousands have been rioting all over China as the economic tailspin of Western economies has left all those Chinese products with no buyers.  Protest demonstrations seem to be directed against the Communist Party which, having long been seen as a source of corruption, is now being blamed for the looming specter of widespread unemployment.  In Longnan, reported the NYT, residents said the disturbances were provoked by economic distress, rampant corruption and a lack of transparency in the local Communist Party.

The great irony, of course, is that modern China, the most aggressive capitalist economy in the world, is now suffering from the dark side of the free market, all the while laboring to preserve the illusion of its communist roots.  Naturally, such a charade cannot hold up indefinitely.

Increasingly, words and labels are not used to communicate meaning but to obscure meaning.  Political correctness has cast a fog of calculated confusion over language and expression.  The Jewish world has not escaped the effects.

It’s easy to excuse as misguided those Jews who identify themselves as adherents to Judaism, even as they simultaneously reject the Divine Word with wholesale abandon in their quest for egalitarianism, open-mindedness, and political correctness.  It’s only slightly more difficult to dismiss those dangerous and disingenuous practitioners of Torah revisionism who continue to proclaim their commitment to Orthodoxy even as they emasculate the philosophy of sincere passion and diligent observance that has preserved Jewish tradition and society for 33 centuries.  These sad but persistent creatures discredit and dishonor the movement to which they claim fealty.

But it is not these who are most responsible for prolonging and deepening our interment in exile.  It is the Jews who know better, the 100%, dyed-in-the-wool, sincere and passionately observant Torah Jews who are preventing the dawn of the messianic era.

The Torah community can genuinely boast so many examples of mesiras nefesh:  self-sacrifice for Torah study, for Torah institutions, for charity, for all kinds of community activism.  But where is the self-sacrifice for achdus — JEWISH UNITY — within the Torah observant community itself?

Where is the willingness to set aside political agendas built upon nuances in Torah philosophy that represent the 3% or 5% of differences that separate us and focus upon the 95% or 97% that we have in common?  Why must our communities stretch themselves thinner and thinner, creating new institutions that are increasingly in danger of financial collapse because we fear exposing ourselves and our children to other Torah Jews who may wear different colored yarmulkes or have different notions concerning the value of secular education or harbor different feelings about the intrinsic sanctity of the State of Israel?

How do we justify our self-destructive divisiveness when we sit on the floor on Tisha B’Av mourning the Temple that was destroyed on account of senseless hatred?  To whom are we speakingIs anybody listening as we remind ourselves that any generation that does not rebuild the Temple is considered to have destroyed it — for the very same reasons it was destroyed 2000 years ago?

Perhaps we ought to ask ourselves if the current crisis of the global economy has not been engineered solely for our benefit, to force us to confront our own failure to rise above our petty differences and find the strength and courage to work together.  When will we recognize that cooperating with other Torah Jews who may differ from us in their ideological perspectives is not the equivalent of  compromising our values?  Just the opposite:  it is refocusing on the common value that should override all others.  Gadol shalom teach the sages — Great is peace.  When will enough voices cry out to make a difference?

The Master of the World called us His chosen people.  How many more lessons will we have to endure before we are willing to choose one another?  When will we finally live up to our name?

Leave a comment

Parshas Vayishlach — Names of Conflict and Destiny

The Talmud tells us that anyone who refers to our forefather Avrohom by his earlier name, Avram, has committed a sin (Berachos 13a). The kabbalists explain that our names are not merely labels but representations that describe the essence of our souls. Therefore, to call our patriarch by anything other than his new name constitutes a negation of his spiritual transformation and a rejection of our spiritual mission as his descendants.

The Talmud suggests that, according to this reasoning, the same should apply to Yaakov after the Almighty changed his name to Yisroel. However, because the Torah itself continues to call him Yaakov, the Talmud concludes that there is no such prohibition. Both names remain relevant as accurate descriptions of Yaakov and, consequently, either name may be used.

But why? The Talmud offers no explanation for why HaShem would have changed Yaakov’s name to Yisroel if He intended the former name to remain relevant. Furthermore, the wording of the verse is nearly identical to that in which Avrohom receives his new name: No longer will your name be called Yaakov; rather, Yisroel shall your name be called (Bereishis 35:10). Why does the Almighty declare that the name Yaakov should no longer be used, then continue the use of that name?

The name change from Yaakov to Yisroel is prophesied earlier, when Yaakov wrestled with the sar shel Eisav, the guardian angel appointed over the nation that would descend from Yaakov’s wicked brother. As he traveled toward his first encounter with his brother in 20 years, Yaakov was forced to engage in spiritual combat with the divine emissary representing Eisav’s power and influence throughout the generations.

By defeating the malach of Eisav in battle, Yaakov not only assured the ultimate victory of his progeny over the descendants of Eisav, but also elevated himself to a spiritual level higher than that of a purely spiritual being. By doing so, Yaakov attained a level of spiritual self-completion that rendered further physical service irrelevant. As Yaakov, he had nothing more to accomplish. To remain in this world, he needed a new goal, a new spiritual purpose requiring a new name. He became Yisroel, and began to direct his efforts toward the fulfillment of a new mission.

Rashi explain that the name Yisroel derives from the word sar, meaning “ruler,” alluding to Yisroel’s ultimate dominion over the world that would characterize the arrival of the messianic era. However, Rav Moshe Alshich interprets Yisroel as deriving from the word yashar, meaning “straight,” in contrast to the name Yaakov, from okav, meaning “crooked.”

This interpretation helps us understand the words of the Sforno, who explains that Yaakov’s original name applies to the contention between him and his brother, Eisav. In dealing with crooked people, one may sometimes have to apply tactics that may themselves appear to be less than upright. Although we dare not adopt the ways of the wicked even in our efforts to vanquish them, occasionally we must draw so near to the boundary between propriety and impropriety that the outside observer may question the virtue of our own actions.

As long as the influence of Eisav remains dominant in the world, the children of Yaakov have no choice but to employ the name Yaakov and all that it implies – as with Yaakov’s apparent manipulation of Eisav to prevent him from misusing his birthright, and as with his temporary deception of their father, Yitzchok, to prevent the disastrous bestowal of the blessings Eisav would have exploited to destroy his brother. Even a saint cannot always retain the image of saintliness when battling unconscionable evil.

However, when the dominion of Eisav is ultimately overthrown and the influence of Eisav is uprooted from the world, then the name Yaakov will no longer be necessary. The necessity of battling against evil will be gone, and all will recognize the uprightness of Yaakov’s descendants and their singular devotion to the service of their Creator. Only the straightness of Yisroel will remain, and the appearance of crookedness imposed upon him by his brother will be nothing more than memory.

Leave a comment

The Future of Education

Frankly, I don’t remember my parents ever calling one of my teachers over a poor grade or because I complained about unfairness.  Now parents routinely call to accost teachers in primary and middle school.

That might not be so bad, except for principals and teachers who are already overworked and undercompensated.  But the trend has continued into college, where professors are now receiving calls from parents to question their children’s grades.

Don’t gasp in disbelief yet.  Employers now report that parents are calling to complain about their children’s job reviews!  Truthfully, I can’t imagine walking into work the day after my mother called my boss to argue about my performance.  But if there’s any question which way things are headed, this sums it up to a tee.

Leave a comment

Sanctifying God’s Name

I’m quite certain my colleague and editor Benyamin Jolkovsky won’t mind my posting this letter.  It should be a source of true hope for all of us.

 

Dear Mr. Jolkovsky:

 

You have my permission to print and edit this letter (I’m sure there are a lot of mistakes in it.), but under no circumstances may you reveal my identity. You will soon see why.

You may not remember me. I am a Pakistani college student who first started reading Jewish World Review while doing research for a paper that I was writing on how the Internet is enabling Jews/Zionists to help their cause. In various Islamic sites I have bookmarked, I would see references to Jewish World Review. It was often described as “hateful”. You were named as an “enemy of Islam”. For my paper, you were the perfect subject.

 

I wrote to you with the hope of engaging you in a debate. You responded politely saying that you didn’t have the time but disagreed with how you were being labeled. You challenged me to read Jewish World Review for 6 months and predicted that if I did that I would find myself changed.

 

The six months ended a number of months ago. My paper was written and I’m still reading your site. Not because I am required to because of research, but because it tells the truth and it inspires me.

 

That’s not an easy thing to admit. But it is the truth.

 

Your site has, as you predicted, changed my view of the West and, particularly, of Jews. I only wish that more Muslims could see and feel what I now do.

 

I was taught that America is the “Great Satan” and the Jews and Israel are the “little Satan”. We see America as exporting filth and atheism to the world; ruining the world. After reading Jewish World Review, I have begun to understand that my understanding of America is very limited. On your site, I see your writers denouncing immorality and immodesty. I also read the articles by rabbis encouraging people to treat each other better no matter what their faith. Your articles often teach concepts about Judaism that are the same as in Islam. But my teachers never were able to make the teachings meaningful. They seemed so stale. On Jewish World Review there is no hatred. I also read hurtful but truthful articles about Islam.

 

The problem of the jihadists is a growing danger. As long as it is, nobody is safe. Not the West and not us who are just trying to live our lives but are scared into silence. The jihadists are winning. Your articles are showing how they are doing so. What you report sickens me because it is all true. Not enough people understand the danger. You do. And your readers do. It is important that you continue to tell the truth but also publish articles that encourage warmth and friendship, not just hurtful but true words as some other sites do. Those were the other sites I used as examples in my paper.

 

I know of other Muslims like me who are reading Jewish World Review. By keeping your site free and open to all without registration, you are helping people like me.

I’m writing you this letter because, for obvious reasons, I cannot send in a donation.. Before you wrote that you wanted to make a difference. I can tell you that you are. Your readers in the West who are free, have the ability and should be supporting you. It is sad that somebody who works as hard as you do doesn’t get the help that he needs.

Mr. Jolkovsky, you are changing lives. You certainly have changed mine and I know of others as well. There are most likely many, many more that you are not aware of.

 

 

There’s not much that I can add. All I can say is: Thank you so much! — BLJ

 

 

You can make a tax deductible charitable contribution of ANY amount — and given the financial situation, we do mean ANY amount — through our secure online form or by making out a check and mailing it to the sponsoring organization at:

 

Keren Yehoshua V’Yisroel/JWR
125 Carey St .
Lakewood , New Jersey 08701

Tax ID: 22-3209160

 

Please note on the “memo line” of your check it is for the Internet educational project.

 

In SINCERE gratitude and friendship,

Binyamin L. Jolkovsky,
Editor in Chief

, ,

Leave a comment

The Song of the Sea

For years now, marine biologists have observed the “songs” of whales — seemingly musical compositions thought to communicate positions for migration or to attract mates.  Now, however, researchers have discovered that sperm whales sing simply for the pleasure of singing.

It’s difficult to hear such reports without thinking of Perek Shira, the ode dating back, perhaps, as far as the great kings David and Solomon, that describes how the myriad creatures and creations that fill the universe sing the praises of the Almighty, each with its own unique voice.

Typically, we understand the “songs” of Perek Shira to mean that the variety and complexity of creation testifies to the handiwork of the Creator.  But perhaps we are meant to understand a more literal meaning as well.

The sea giants say:  Praise HaShem from the earth; sea giants and all [denizens of] the watery depths (Tehillim 148:7).

Growing to dimensions far beyond any inhabitants of the land, surviving depths that would crush human beings in an instant, these magnificent creatures awe and inspire us.  But now we know that they do something more than that:

They sing.

Leave a comment

Self-Congratulatory Self-Indulgence Dept.

Here’s a comment from my recent article, The White Fedora, on aish.com:

I have been a faithful reader of Aish.com for more years than I can remember, and this is one of the most deeply satisfying articles I have ever read here.

Quite recently at a Shabbos meal a wonderful young rabbi I know was musing aloud about the difficulty of teaching young people the fallacy of moral relativism. I “just happened” to be a guest at his table. A few days later, I “just happened” to visit a certain Jewish website (not this one) for the first time in many months, if not years. While browsing the articles on that site I “just happened” to read an article Rabbi Goldson wrote about his fascinating experience demonstrating the fallacy of moral relativism to young people in Budapest. How delightful that it “just happened” to be published at just that time.

Of course I sent a link to the rabbi whose family had so kindly shared a Shabbos meal with me. He replied with the comment, “Thank you, it was great!!”

Rabbi Goldson, you and he might never meet in this lifetime, but surely that article of yours will contribute to his good work in a way that would give you great pleasure if you knew. I”m delighted just to have been allowed to be a means of making such an obviously necessary connection.

As you say, “Whether *or* not we recognize how our individual contributions complete the symphony has no bearing on the value of those contributions.” True — but even a small degree of recognition, when it comes, adds so much richness and depth of meaning to this strange adventure of being alive, this weird and wonderful symphony we’re all part of.

Leave a comment

Friday Flashback — The Public Face of God

“There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds.”

This is the wording upon a sign allowed by Washington State Governor Christine Gregoire to grace the state capitol building in Olympia.  The sign rests along side the traditional Xmas season nativity scene.

I find it a little awkward defending public Christian symbolism as a Jew in a country famous for its separation of church and state, but Bill O’Reilly has it right when he brands this kind of moral equivalence (masquerading as respect for the First Amendment) as an attack not upon Christianity but upon the foundations of morality.

It’s with this in mind that I offer a look back on what I wrote concerning the name of God in the Pledge of Allegiance and the heart of a matter that transcends religious sectarianism.

,

Leave a comment

Parshas Vayeitzei — Bringing the Well into the City

And [Yaakov] saw that there was a well in the field.  Three flocks of sheep were there lying beside it, since it was from this well that the flocks were watered, and a great stone [blocked] the mouth of the well (Bereishis 29:2).

This is how the Torah describes Yaakov’s arrival at the house of Lavan, his uncle, after fleeing from his wicked brother, Eisav, and beginning his search for a wife.  Curiously, when Eliezer, servant of Yaakov’s grandfather Avrohom, arrived at the same place a generation earlier, the Torah describes the location of the well not “in the field” but “at the edge of the city” (Bereishis 24:11).

This seeming inconsistancy provides the basis for an enigmatic debate recorded in the Talmud (Bechoros 8b):

The Elders of Athens said to Rabbi Yehoshua ben Chananyah, “We have a well out in the fields; bring it into the city.”

Rabbi Yehoshua took chaff and threw it before them, saying, “Make me a rope out of chaff and I will bring it in.”

They asked, “Who can make a rope out of chaff?”

He replied, “Then who can bring a well from the field into the city?”

Last week, we explained that the Torah employs the imagery of a well  — the source of water, which is the basis of physical life — as a symbol for Torah itself, which is the source of spiritual life.

The Malbim explains that when peace and a sense of unity exist among the Jewish people, when they live in the Land of Israel with the Divine Word guiding their actions and their attitudes, then the “well” of Torah is “in the city,” providing the people with security and their settlements with prosperity.

However, when our spiritual negligence and complacency cause us to be exiled from our land and subjected to the uncertainty and unpredictability of life among the nations of the earth, when we have to struggle against all manner of obstacles to keep G-d’s word and His commandments central in our lives, then the well of Torah is “in the field.”

This was the assertion of the Elders of Athens, the scholars of the Roman Empire who based their wisdom on the teachings of the ancient Greeks:  If you Jews are divided against one another, if you yourselves recognize sinas chinom, the senseless hatred among you, as the cause of your exile, then how can you ever expect to earn your redemption?  How can you believe that the well “in the field” will ever become transformed into a well “in the city?”

Rabbi Yehoshua’ s answer finds its meaning in the continuation of the Torah narrative:

And all the flocks would gather there, and they would roll away the stone from the mouth of the well and allow the flocks to drink, and then they would return the stone to its place over the mouth of the well (Bereishis 29:2).

To bring the well from the “field” into the “city” requires a spiritual “rope” to bind the future with the past.  The Malbim explains that the three flocks represent the three eras of Jewish exile, each imposing upon the people the challenges and crises.  Only by working together to overcome these challenges will the people achieve a level of unity to become worthy of redemption and acquiring the merit to build HaShem’s Temple so that the Divine Presence can dwell in their midst. 

In the course of the first two exiles, the collective merit of a unified Jewish nation ultimately “rolled away the stone” of temptation and transgression, allowing the waters of spirituality to flow free and revive a spiritually thirsty people.  And each time, prosperity encouraged the people to stray after the inclinations of the hearts, so that the stone of self-indulgence and self-interest rolled back to its place and drove the people back into the parched desert of exile.

The first era was galus Mitzrayim, the exile in Egypt, which forged the people into a nation and culminated in their entry into the land and their ultimate construction of the first Beis HaMikdash.  Tragically, without the external pressure provided by enemies around them, their commitment to one another dissolved and, over time, led to the erosion of their collective merit and their exile to Babylon.

Thus began the second era, in which the Jews gradually earned back the privilege of living in their land, rebuilding the Temple, and regaining political autonomy in the aftermath of the miracle of Chanukah.  But infighting among the descendants of the Hasmoneans eventually led to the disintegration of political stability, the conquest by the Roman Empire, and the destruction of the second Temple.

Out of the ruins of the Roman Empire grew Western Civilization, the final exile of Jewish history, in which the twin attractions of material prosperity and cultural assimilation have exceeded all the obstacles to spirituality that have confronted the Jews throughout all previous ages.  And once again, the divisiveness that traces its roots back to the senseless hatred of 2000 years ago stands in the way of bringing the well of Torah and spiritual redemption from the “field” into the “city.”

Scattered like chaff, the Jewish people will remain in exile until, by bonding together in unity, they form the “rope” that connects them back to their origins as a cohesive people.  When that happens, Rabbi Yehoshua told the Elders, when the “chaff” of disunity becomes a “rope” of redemption, then the Jewish people will find their way home.

But how is that possible?  the Elders asked.  Just as chaff cannot make a rope, disaffected and disparate individuals cannot form a people.

That may be true, answered Rabbi Yehoshua.  But the image of chaff only describes the Jewish people in the most simplistic and superficial way.  We may appear cut off from one another, but we share the collective soul of the Almighty’s chosen people.  The more we become distant from one another, the more we yearn to return to our common roots.  As the exile grows darker and deeper, we come closer to the time when the very depths of our spiritual darkness will compel us to pull together, thereby pulling ourselves forward into the light of the messianic era.

,

Leave a comment

Kashrus and Ethics Presentation at YU

From:               YESHIVA UNIVERSITY

Contact:            publicaffairs@yu.edu

 

RABBIS OF ALL MAJOR ORTHODOX ORGANIZATIONS TO ADDRESS THE “KOSHER QUANDRY: ETHICS AND KASHRUT” IN LIGHT OF AGRIPROCESSORS SCANDAL TUESDAY, DEC. 9 AT YESHIVA UNIVERSITY

 

In light of the ongoing Agriprocessors scandal that has rocked the kosher meat industry and the Orthodox community, Rabbi Avi Shafran, director of public affairs for Agudath Israel of America, Rabbi Menachem Genack, rabbinic administrator and CEO of the Orthodox Union’s Kashrut Division, Rabbi Basil Herring, executive vice president of the Rabbinical Council of America, and Shmuly Yanklowitz, co-founder and director of Uri L’Tzedek, will engage in a candid conversation on the interplay between ethics and kashrut at a program on Tuesday, December 9, at 7 p.m. in Weissberg Commons on Yeshiva University’s main campus, 2495 Amsterdam Ave. at 184th St., New York.

 

The program – “The Kosher Quandary: Ethics and Kashrut” – serves as the launch event for the new student-run organization at YU called TEIQU, A Torah Exploration of Ideas, Questions, and Understanding.  The organization is devoted to nurturing intellectual dialogue on campus surrounding Jewish matters of import. 

 

The panelists will explain their views and insights on the kosher quandary, address recent developments and share their prescriptions for action. 

 

Who:               Rabbis of All Major Orthodox Organizations

What:              “The Kosher Quandary: Ethics and Kashrut”

When:               Tuesday, December 9, 2008; 7 p.m.

Where:            Weissberg Commons, Yeshiva University

                         2495 Amsterdam Ave. at 184th St. 

Leave a comment