Archive for category Culture

A Tale of Two Michaels

As music icon Michael Jackson was planning his return to the stage, basketball icon Michael Jordan was appearing in a less familiar arena. At the Golf Digest U.S. Open Challenge, Mr. Jordan shot an 86 — not bad, but a little off his game.

His foursome included Justin Timberlake, Ben Roethlisberger, and Larry Giebelhausen, a Phoenix police lieutenant who had won the privilege of playing in such celebrated company with a six-word contest entry: “I’m a Cop; I’ll Shoot Low.”

It’s hard to imagine Michael Jackson having participated in a similar venue. Whatever common touch the pop star might have once had, it disappeared decades ago, along with his original nose, cheekbones, and coloring, under the searing lights of fame and fortune. It’s to Michael Jordan’s credit that he has retained a bit of humility, to allow “one of the folks” to hobnob with him over 18 holes (not to mention remaining gracious while performing below his usual standard).

No one really doubts whether Mr. Jackson’s meteoric success from such a young age contributed to his tragic decline into scandal, freakishness, and premature death. The kind of humility displayed by Mr. Jordan could never have survived the early adulation accorded Mr. Jackson, no matter how humble his beginnings.

Perhaps the difference can be summed up by what Michael Jordan once said about himself: “I’ve failed over and over and over in my life. And that is why I succeed.”

The sages teach that a tzaddik falls seven times. By grappling with obstacles, by failing and learning from their mistakes, those with the potential to achieve spiritual greatness succeed in achieving it. So too in almost every form of endeavor.

Michael Jordan may not be what we think of as a tzaddik, a truly righteous man. But it is reassuring to see someone who occupies the highest strata of celebrity status showing us that wealth and notoriety do not have to produce the kind of self-absorption, self-indulgence, or ghoulishness that we have come to expect.  It is equally reassuring to contemplate how there may be no more reliable strategy for climbing the ladder of success than by persisting in the upward ascent from one rung of failure to another.

,

Leave a comment

1984 and the Language of Confusion

Sixty years after Orwell’s masterpiece, his message is more prophetic than ever.

And my apologies for the typo in the fifth from the last paragraph.  Essays on language should be pristine.

, , ,

7 Comments

Real Commitment

Here’s a shining example of three levels of commitment: commitment to professionalism, commitment to a parent, and commitment to the Almighty.

The common denominator: commitment to principle.

Leave a comment

A Lifetime of Mistaken Identity

Two girls switched at birth discover the mistake after half-a-century.

How would you react?

2 Comments

The Pursuit of Happiness

New research indicates that old, male republicans are the happiest Americans.  Without  commenting on the validity of the methodology or the results, it offers a good excuse to revisit the Torah perspective on what makes us happy.

1 Comment

Jeff Jacoby on Justice

Is the current administration poised to abandon both Torah and constitutional justice in favor of empathy and political correctness?

Leave a comment

Talking to the Wall Dept.

My efforts to engage an ideologue in civil discourse.  Draw your own conclusions.

, ,

Leave a comment

Email of the Week: A Story of Socialism

An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never failed a single student before but had once failed an entire class.

That class had insisted that socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.

The professor then said, “OK, we will have an experiment in this class on socialism. All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A.

After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B.

The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy.

As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little.

The second test average was a D! No one was happy.

When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.

The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.

All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.

Could not be any simpler than that.

Hat tip: Dave Weinbaum

,

1 Comment

Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise on Repentance

Well, not exactly.   But definitely worth reading.

,

Leave a comment

Krauthammer on bioethics in the Obama administration

“Is [Obama] so obtuse as not to see that he had just made a choice of ethics over science? Yet, unlike Bush, who painstakingly explained the balance of ethical and scientific goods he was trying to achieve, Obama did not even pretend to make the case why some practices are morally permissible and others not.

“This is not just intellectual laziness. It is the moral arrogance of a man who continuously dismisses his critics as ideological while he is guided exclusively by pragmatism (in economics, social policy, foreign policy) and science in medical ethics.”

Read all of Charles Krauthammer’s scathingly brilliant critique here.

,

Leave a comment